As I mentioned earlier, a no-move-clause is exactly what it sounds like unless there are any exceptions added to it. It means that a team cannot send down a player or trade a player without the players explicit permission. And I was using Toronto specifically as an example because your were, I talked about a potential trade from Chicago's point of view equally as much and said that not trading Kane has probably already worked out better just because since then, they've won another cup. Sure they might be able (might being a key word) to challenge for a few more if they traded Kane, but would they come out with more than the 1 cup.
I didn't ever say Turris was failing miserably, I thought he played fine. What I said was that the management probably didn't think he fit their system as well as they wanted which is why they might not want to pay Turris the 6mil he deserves. It'd be pretty awesome if Ottawa ends up upping their budget or even removing it.