Jump to content

Game Plan Hockey Manager

Game Plan Hockey Manager is an online hockey manager game against real people, played directly in your web browser on any device.

Subforums

  1. Register to chat with Game Plan Hockey Manager today!   (6,244 visits to this link)

    To experience all of Game Plan Hockey Manager and get the best discussions please register by clicking 'Create Chat Profile' on the top bar - it is quick and free.

  2. Change Log

    Release Notes on Game Plan Hockey Manager

    470
    posts
  3. 4,085
    posts
  4. 4,020
    posts
  5. Team Stories

    GPHM Network | Franchise and Dynasties | Press Conferences | Team Media

    press-conference.png

    101
    posts

276 topics in this forum

    • 12 replies
    • 648 views
    • 10 replies
    • 770 views
  1. NHL discussion 1 2 3 4 12

    • 280 replies
    • 19,282 views
    • 20 replies
    • 6,919 views
    • 1 reply
    • 2,056 views
    • 23 replies
    • 349 views
    • 15 replies
    • 203 views
    • 5 replies
    • 138 views
    • 6 replies
    • 211 views
    • 2 replies
    • 93 views
    • 2 replies
    • 130 views
    • 4 replies
    • 280 views
  2. Trading with CPU

    • 8 replies
    • 240 views
    • 23 replies
    • 873 views
  3. Old Guys 1 2 3

    • 63 replies
    • 6,782 views
    • 1 reply
    • 197 views
    • 3 replies
    • 255 views
    • 0 replies
    • 200 views
    • 3 replies
    • 407 views
    • 8 replies
    • 427 views


  • Latest Online

  • Latest Posts

    • Chicago Blitz (4-7) 7 3 13 7 -- 30 Birmingham Stallions (4-7) 7 10 7 10 -- 34 First Quarter Birmingham - Rolle 71 interception return (Dawson kick), 4:28 Chicago - Lewis 7 run (Edinger kick), 9:38 Second Quarter Birmingham - Plummer 17 interception return (Dawson kick), 8:10 Chicago - Edinger 37 FG, 14:09 Birmingham - Dawson 29 FG, 14:51 Third Quarter Chicago - Lewis 1 run (2-Point conversion failed), 8:15 Birmingham - Dwight 31 pass from Manning (Dawson kick), 12:11 Chicago - Chambers 6 pass from King (Edinger kick), 14:16 Fourth Quarter Birmingham - Hayes 13 pass from Manning (Dawson kick), 6:02 Chicago - Lewis 46 run (Edinger kick), 8:36 Birmingham - Dawson 28 FG, 13:27 Turnovers were the story of this game.  Most teams just can't survive 2 pick-six interceptions.  Birmingham HB Rickey WIlliams and Chicago HB Jamal Lewis were studs for their respective teams.  Birmingham CB Samari Rolle  was outstanding with a pick-six and an additional interception.     BIRMINGHAM STALLIONS Passing Cmp Att Yds %% TD INT QB1 Peyton Manning 15 29 166 51.7 2 0 Rushing Att Yds Avg TD Fmb HB1 Ricky Williams 24 111 4.6 0 1 FB1 Jim Finn 4 46 11.5 0 0 HB3 Cecil Collins 2 17 8.5 0 0 QB1 Peyton Manning 5 10 2.0 0 0 Receiving Rec Yds Avg TD Fmb Trgt WR2 Tim Dwight 4 59 14.8 1 0 7 WR1 Marty Booker 3 30 10.0 0 0 4 HB3 Cecil Collins 2 28 14.0 0 0 2 WR3 Reggie Wayne 4 27 6.8 0 0 5 WR4 Donald Hayes 2 22 11.0 1 0 2 Defense Tck Sck Int Fmb TD Knk Saf S1 Ahmed Plummer 10 0 1 0 1 0 0 S2 Pat Dennis 6 1 0 0 0 1 0 LB1 London Fletcher  4 0 0 0 0 1 0 CB1 Samari Rolle 4 0 2 0 1 2 0 DE2 Tom Burke 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 CB2 Allen Rossum 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 LB2 Morlon Greenwood 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 CB3 Rich Coady 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 CB4 Michael Green 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 LB4 Orlando Huff 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 S3 Scott Shields 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 S4 Armon Hatcher 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 LB3 Danny Clark 1 0 0 0 0 0 0   CHICAGO BLITZ Passing Cmp Att Yds %% TD INT QB1 Shaun King 16 34 237 47.1 1 3 Rushing Att Yds Avg TD Fmb HB1 Jamal Lewis 21 126 6.0 3 0 HB3 Correll Buckhalter 4 31 7.8 0 0 QB1 Shaun King 3 13 4.3 0 0 FB1 Fred Beasley 1 7 7.0 0 0 Receiving Rec Yds Avg TD Fmb Trgt WR2 Chris Chambers 8 153 19.1 1 0 9 WR1 Donald Driver 3 42 14.0 2 0 9 WR3 Cedrick Wilson 3 27 9.0 0 0 5 HB3 Correll Buckhalter 1 12 12.0 0 0 1 HB2 Jonathan Linton 1 3 3.0 0 0 1 Defense Tck Sck Int Fmb TD Knk Saf CB1 Patrick Surtain 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 S2 Cory Hall 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 LB1 Keith Brooking 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 CB2 Deltha O'Neal 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 CB3 Tebucky Jones 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 CB4 Kelly Herndon  4 0 0 1 0 0 0 LB2 Kailee Wong 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 S1 Earl Little  4 0 0 0 0 2 0 S3 Rashard Cook 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 LB3 Dat Nguyen 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 DE2 Kyle Vandenbosch 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 DE1 Marques Douglas  2 0 0 0 0 0 0 DT1 Cornelius Griffin 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 S4 Jimmy Wyrick  0 0 0 0 0 1 0 PLAYS OF THE GAME Birmingham CB Samari Rolle 71yd Interception Return TD Birmingham S Ahmed Plummer 17yd Interception Return TD Chicago HB Jamal Lewis 46yd TD Run
    • Yes, you have to have puck possession to get a shot. However that isn't really what corsi is telling you. Going back to Carolina as for why. Carolina, since they became "good" statistically corsi wise, has had the mentality of shoot the puck from anywhere, anytime. They weren't dominating possession of the puck so much as they were throwing a lot of bad shots at the net. The net result of that was averaging ~35 shots a game for with ~27 against. This served to heavily bloat the corsi and offensive zone face-off numbers of the team even though they were actually mid pack, at best, puck possession wise. Thus Carolina was gaming the statistical system to look good when they really weren't that good at all. This is why I think the actual puck possession % is the most important team tracking stat. It will actually tell you if you are getting dominated, if the game is close or if you happened to be playing "Carolina" that game.
    • Game #29: #3 UCLA Bruins (21-5, 13-4) @ #24 Colorado Buffaloes (19-9, 11-6) UCLA is 17-0 at home but 4-5 on the road, so I’m thinking we at least have a chance.  But UCLA scores well (80 ppg which is 8th best in the country) and defend well (64.7 ppg which is 28th best in the nation).  The Bruins have 3 very good scorers in SG Kyle Taylor (17.7 ppg), PF Jamal Magloire (17.2 ppg) and PG Darelle Denson (15.7 ppg).  Magloire won’t play, though, after breaking his hand recently.  I’m hoping UCLA has a let-down tonight since they have locked up 1st place in the conference, but doubt that will be the case.  Uncharacteristically, we’re going to run a deliberate offense to try to slow the game down to attempt to keep the Bruins off-balance. UCLA missed their first shot but then hit their next 5 including 4 from beyond the arc to jump ahead 14-6.  We found ourselves in a 25-8 hole after 9 minutes of play when we had hit just 3 of 16 FG attempts.  We turned things around in the latter stages of the first half and closed to within 3 points at 43-40 at halftime.  PF Kenton Dunn poured in 18 points for us.  UCLA’s SG Kyle Taylor scored 17 and PG Darelle Denson had 13 points. We tied the game at 44-44 after 3 minutes of play in the 2nd half.  With 12:05 remaining, PF Charles Maors hit a 3 from near the corner and we took our first lead of the game at 51-50.  The lead shifted back and forth but neither team could go ahead by more than 2 points.  With 2:21 we led 63-62.  Then PG Justin Wilson was fouled while shooting and hit both free throws to make it 65-62.  UCLA then connected on 2 foul shots and our lead shrunk to a single point.  With 58 seconds remaining, the Bruins dropped in 2 more free throws and regained the lead at 66-65.  We missed a shot and UCLA scored inside and was fouled.  They converted the 3 point play and we trailed by 4 with 36 seconds left.  We had to foul and UCLA again sank both free throws.  After we called a time out, SF Rick Coffey hit the 3 on the play we set up as we closed to within 3 with 11 seconds to go.  UCLA scored on a quick jumper and we threw up a last second 3 from behind the half court line that went in.  But we still lost 73-71.  A good effort by us but not quite good enough.  Losing our last two conference games was tough but both were against very talented teams and we were in both up to the final buzzer. PF/SF Kenton Dunn scored 22, grabbed 8 boards, and blocked 3 shots.  PF Charles Maors scored 12 and SG Steve Jackson hit for 11 points.  UCLA’s SG Kyle Taylor poured in 30 points and had 8 rebounds and 4 blocks while PG Darelle Denson scored 24. While we it was disappointing to lose another close game, we were buoyed when we checked the other Pac-12 scores: #23 Stanford-79, Arizona-64 Washington State-85, #19 California-73 Utah-74, Oregon State-55 Oregon-61, USC-58 Arizona State-83, Washington-63 So with Arizona and California also losing, we remained in a 3-way tie with those two teams for 2nd place.  The tie-breakers favor us so we’ll be the #2 seed in the conference tournament.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Top Downloads

×
×
  • Create New...