All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Today
  2. The White Sox approve this deal. We need a 3B for 2019 and don't really have any other options in the system right now, so this seemed like a no-brainer. Not a terribly high OBP, which is something we need, but a very solid 3B defender and sufficient offense. Happy to move McCloskey & Taylor to get the deal done. Thanks, Cole.
  3. Milwaukee Brewers sends 3B Rosell Herrera ML Chicago Whitesox sends SS Ronnie Taylor AAA SP Kyle McCloskey R Glendale Herrera has been a good player over the past couple of seasons here in Milwaukee his future with the team after this season was up in the air. Being able to get McCloskey a young prospect with great upside on all 3 of his pitches was the kicker that put the deal over the top. Taylor is a good system player who may be able to make an impact with his legs in the bigs for the next couple of years as we rebuild. We wish Herrera and the Whitesox organization the best of luck next season.
  4. Yesterday
  5. WEEK 11 PLAYERS OF THE WEEK Offensive - Tampa Bay HB Fred Taylor Defensive - Birmingham CB Samari Rolle Rookie - Los Angeles DE Richard Seymour 2KFL Standings 2001 season November 11, 2001 Week 11 Atlantic Division W L T PF PA Stk Home Away vs Div Washington 9 2 0 350 271 W3 5-1-0 4-1-0 4-1-0 New Jersey 4 7 0 266 306 L2 3-2-0 1-5-0 2-3-0 Philadelphia 4 7 0 277 267 L1 3-3-0 1-4-0 3-2-0 Boston 4 7 0 289 383 W1 3-2-0 1-5-0 1-4-0 Central Division W L T PF PA Stk Home Away vs Div Tampa Bay 10 1 0 400 231 W1 6-0-0 4-1-0 5-0-0 Michigan 5 6 0 325 325 W2 3-2-0 2-4-0 2-3-0 Birmingham 4 7 0 277 320 W1 3-3-0 1-4-0 3-2-0 Chicago 4 7 0 299 330 L2 1-4-0 3-3-0 0-5-0 Pacific Division W L T PF PA Stk Home Away vs Div Denver 7 4 0 298 262 W5 3-3-0 4-1-0 3-2-0 Oakland 5 6 0 267 262 L1 3-2-0 2-4-0 2-3-0 Arizona 5 6 0 210 290 L1 4-2-0 1-4-0 2-3-0 Los Angeles 5 6 0 262 273 L3 2-3-0 3-3-0 3-2-0 Going into the last week of the 2001 season, The division titles are all wrapped up but the wild card race is a logjam. The Michigan Panthers currently own the tie breakers, so if the win, they are in. Oakland, Arizona and Los Angeles are the next ranked teams via the tie breakers. This next week is going to be wild with the wildcard teams. WEEK 12 SCHEDULE Washington Federals (9-2) at Boston Breakers (4-7) Philadelphia Stars (4-7) at New Jersey Generals (4-7) Tampa Bay Bandits (10-1) at Chicago Blitz (4-7) Denver Gold (7-4) at Oakland Invaders (5-6) Arizona Wranglers (5-6) at Los Angeles Express (5-6)
  6. Denver Gold (7-4) 7 13 10 3 -- 33 Arizona Wranglers (5-6) 0 17 0 0 -- 17 First Quarter Denver - Faulk 4 run (Brown kick), 10:30 Second Quarter Arizona - McAllister 3 run (Gramatica kick), 0:42 Denver - Brown 45 FG, 4:31 Denver - Thomas 44 fumble return (Brown kick), 6:20 Denver - Brown 28 FG, 9:51 Arizona - McAllister 66 run (Gramatica kick), 10:22 Arizona - Gramatica 28 FG, 14:18 Third Quarter Denver - Brown 18 FG, 8:07 Denver - Clark 1 pass from Griese (Brown kick), 12:49 Fourth Quarter Denver - Brown 45 FG, 13:43 Denver clinched the Pacific Division championship with the dismantling of the Arizona Wranglers. At halftime, Denver was leading 20-17 and then went on to score 13 unanswered points in the 2nd half to put the game away. Arizona committed two untimely turnovers in the 2nd half to seal their own fates as well. DENVER GOLD Passing Cmp Att Yds %% TD INT QB1 Brian Griese 17 26 192 65.4 1 2 Rushing Att Yds Avg TD Fmb HB1 Kevin Faulk 22 62 2.8 1 1 HB2 Skip Hicks 5 27 5.4 0 0 HB3 Anthony Thomas 1 23 23.0 0 0 FB1 Cecil Martin 2 13 6.5 0 0 QB1 Brian Griese 8 9 1.1 0 0 Receiving Rec Yds Avg TD Fmb Trgt WR1 Brandon Stokley 5 55 11.0 0 0 6 WR2 Jerry Porter 3 41 13.7 0 0 7 TE1 Desmond Clark 4 37 9.3 1 0 4 WR3 Drew Bennett 2 30 15.0 0 0 3 WR4 Alvis Whitted 1 19 19.0 0 0 2 HB1 Kevin Faulk 2 10 5.0 0 0 2 Defense Tck Sck Int Fmb TD Knk Saf CB4 Marquis Smith 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 S3 Ralph Brown 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 S2 Jerry Azumah 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 CB1 Corey Chavous 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 CB3 Shaunard Harts 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 S1 Tony Parrish 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 LB1 Brian Urlacher 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 DT2 Alfonso Boone 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 CB2 Daylon McCutcheon 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 LB4 Ed Hartwell 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 LB5 Travian Smith 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 DT1 Kelly Gregg 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 DE2 Justin Smith 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 LB2 Adalius Thomas 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 S4 Anthony Henry 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ARIZONA WRANGLERS Passing Cmp Att Yds %% TD INT QB1 Donovan McNabb 17 30 181 56.7 0 1 Rushing Att Yds Avg TD Fmb HB1 Deuce McAllister 13 107 8.2 2 0 HB3 Troy Hambrick 2 13 6.5 0 0 HB2 Thomas Jones 3 13 4.3 0 0 QB1 Donovan McNabb 1 11 11.0 0 0 FB1 Robert Thomas 1 1 1.0 0 0 Receiving Rec Yds Avg TD Fmb Trgt WR2 Todd Pinkston 5 77 15.4 0 0 7 WR4 Quentin McCord 2 34 17.0 0 0 3 WR3 Darnerien McCants 3 32 10.7 0 0 5 WR5 Snoop Minnis 3 23 7.7 0 0 3 TE1 Todd Heap 2 10 5.0 0 1 4 HB2 Thomas Jones 1 3 3.0 0 0 1 HB1 Deuce McAllister 1 2 2.0 0 0 2 Defense Tck Sck Int Fmb TD Knk Saf LB1 Dhani Jones 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 S1 Paris Lenon 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 CB2 David Barrett 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 LB2 LaVar Arrington 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 S2 Mark Roman 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 CB1 Fernando Bryant 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 CB4 Tod McBride 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 LB3 Clark Haggans 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 CB3 Tony Dixon 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 DT2 Kris Jenkins 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 DE1 James Hall 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 S3 Antuan Edwards 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 DT1 Brian Young 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 PLAYS OF THE GAME Denver LB Adalius Thomas 44yd Fumble Return TD Arizona HB Deuce McAllister 66yd TD Run
  7. Hello Everybody, As the title of this weeks blog update says, then we have spend most of the past week doing bug fixing. The main things we have fixed are: When simulating a bowl or conference champio... View the full article
  8. Last week
  9. The graphics look great! The game sounds real good as well. I would be interested in checking it out. Maybe even do a review. Keep up the good work.
  10. Chicago Blitz (4-7) 7 3 13 7 -- 30 Birmingham Stallions (4-7) 7 10 7 10 -- 34 First Quarter Birmingham - Rolle 71 interception return (Dawson kick), 4:28 Chicago - Lewis 7 run (Edinger kick), 9:38 Second Quarter Birmingham - Plummer 17 interception return (Dawson kick), 8:10 Chicago - Edinger 37 FG, 14:09 Birmingham - Dawson 29 FG, 14:51 Third Quarter Chicago - Lewis 1 run (2-Point conversion failed), 8:15 Birmingham - Dwight 31 pass from Manning (Dawson kick), 12:11 Chicago - Chambers 6 pass from King (Edinger kick), 14:16 Fourth Quarter Birmingham - Hayes 13 pass from Manning (Dawson kick), 6:02 Chicago - Lewis 46 run (Edinger kick), 8:36 Birmingham - Dawson 28 FG, 13:27 Turnovers were the story of this game. Most teams just can't survive 2 pick-six interceptions. Birmingham HB Rickey WIlliams and Chicago HB Jamal Lewis were studs for their respective teams. Birmingham CB Samari Rolle was outstanding with a pick-six and an additional interception. BIRMINGHAM STALLIONS Passing Cmp Att Yds %% TD INT QB1 Peyton Manning 15 29 166 51.7 2 0 Rushing Att Yds Avg TD Fmb HB1 Ricky Williams 24 111 4.6 0 1 FB1 Jim Finn 4 46 11.5 0 0 HB3 Cecil Collins 2 17 8.5 0 0 QB1 Peyton Manning 5 10 2.0 0 0 Receiving Rec Yds Avg TD Fmb Trgt WR2 Tim Dwight 4 59 14.8 1 0 7 WR1 Marty Booker 3 30 10.0 0 0 4 HB3 Cecil Collins 2 28 14.0 0 0 2 WR3 Reggie Wayne 4 27 6.8 0 0 5 WR4 Donald Hayes 2 22 11.0 1 0 2 Defense Tck Sck Int Fmb TD Knk Saf S1 Ahmed Plummer 10 0 1 0 1 0 0 S2 Pat Dennis 6 1 0 0 0 1 0 LB1 London Fletcher 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 CB1 Samari Rolle 4 0 2 0 1 2 0 DE2 Tom Burke 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 CB2 Allen Rossum 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 LB2 Morlon Greenwood 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 CB3 Rich Coady 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 CB4 Michael Green 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 LB4 Orlando Huff 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 S3 Scott Shields 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 S4 Armon Hatcher 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 LB3 Danny Clark 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 CHICAGO BLITZ Passing Cmp Att Yds %% TD INT QB1 Shaun King 16 34 237 47.1 1 3 Rushing Att Yds Avg TD Fmb HB1 Jamal Lewis 21 126 6.0 3 0 HB3 Correll Buckhalter 4 31 7.8 0 0 QB1 Shaun King 3 13 4.3 0 0 FB1 Fred Beasley 1 7 7.0 0 0 Receiving Rec Yds Avg TD Fmb Trgt WR2 Chris Chambers 8 153 19.1 1 0 9 WR1 Donald Driver 3 42 14.0 2 0 9 WR3 Cedrick Wilson 3 27 9.0 0 0 5 HB3 Correll Buckhalter 1 12 12.0 0 0 1 HB2 Jonathan Linton 1 3 3.0 0 0 1 Defense Tck Sck Int Fmb TD Knk Saf CB1 Patrick Surtain 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 S2 Cory Hall 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 LB1 Keith Brooking 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 CB2 Deltha O'Neal 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 CB3 Tebucky Jones 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 CB4 Kelly Herndon 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 LB2 Kailee Wong 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 S1 Earl Little 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 S3 Rashard Cook 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 LB3 Dat Nguyen 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 DE2 Kyle Vandenbosch 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 DE1 Marques Douglas 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 DT1 Cornelius Griffin 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 S4 Jimmy Wyrick 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 PLAYS OF THE GAME Birmingham CB Samari Rolle 71yd Interception Return TD Birmingham S Ahmed Plummer 17yd Interception Return TD Chicago HB Jamal Lewis 46yd TD Run
  11. The Twins agree to this deal. It increases the likelihood that Sano is traded, but we are not to that point quite yet. Ealy is a good prospect but we drafted quite a few last season and fill it is a position of depth.
  12. Seattle sends... 1B Prince Fielder Minnesota sends... LF Jerrion Ealy (R Fort Myers) With the acquisition of Juan Francisco to play DH in Seattle, Prince Fielder became expendable. In exchange, we bring back young prospect Jerrion Ealy, whom we like for his high contact bat, speed, and above average defense across all outfield positions. We wish Prince the best of luck in Minnesota, and thanks to Rocky for the quick and easy swap.
  13. rainsilent

    Advanced stats help

    Yes, you have to have puck possession to get a shot. However that isn't really what corsi is telling you. Going back to Carolina as for why. Carolina, since they became "good" statistically corsi wise, has had the mentality of shoot the puck from anywhere, anytime. They weren't dominating possession of the puck so much as they were throwing a lot of bad shots at the net. The net result of that was averaging ~35 shots a game for with ~27 against. This served to heavily bloat the corsi and offensive zone face-off numbers of the team even though they were actually mid pack, at best, puck possession wise. Thus Carolina was gaming the statistical system to look good when they really weren't that good at all. This is why I think the actual puck possession % is the most important team tracking stat. It will actually tell you if you are getting dominated, if the game is close or if you happened to be playing "Carolina" that game.
  14. Game #29: #3 UCLA Bruins (21-5, 13-4) @ #24 Colorado Buffaloes (19-9, 11-6) UCLA is 17-0 at home but 4-5 on the road, so I’m thinking we at least have a chance. But UCLA scores well (80 ppg which is 8th best in the country) and defend well (64.7 ppg which is 28th best in the nation). The Bruins have 3 very good scorers in SG Kyle Taylor (17.7 ppg), PF Jamal Magloire (17.2 ppg) and PG Darelle Denson (15.7 ppg). Magloire won’t play, though, after breaking his hand recently. I’m hoping UCLA has a let-down tonight since they have locked up 1st place in the conference, but doubt that will be the case. Uncharacteristically, we’re going to run a deliberate offense to try to slow the game down to attempt to keep the Bruins off-balance. UCLA missed their first shot but then hit their next 5 including 4 from beyond the arc to jump ahead 14-6. We found ourselves in a 25-8 hole after 9 minutes of play when we had hit just 3 of 16 FG attempts. We turned things around in the latter stages of the first half and closed to within 3 points at 43-40 at halftime. PF Kenton Dunn poured in 18 points for us. UCLA’s SG Kyle Taylor scored 17 and PG Darelle Denson had 13 points. We tied the game at 44-44 after 3 minutes of play in the 2nd half. With 12:05 remaining, PF Charles Maors hit a 3 from near the corner and we took our first lead of the game at 51-50. The lead shifted back and forth but neither team could go ahead by more than 2 points. With 2:21 we led 63-62. Then PG Justin Wilson was fouled while shooting and hit both free throws to make it 65-62. UCLA then connected on 2 foul shots and our lead shrunk to a single point. With 58 seconds remaining, the Bruins dropped in 2 more free throws and regained the lead at 66-65. We missed a shot and UCLA scored inside and was fouled. They converted the 3 point play and we trailed by 4 with 36 seconds left. We had to foul and UCLA again sank both free throws. After we called a time out, SF Rick Coffey hit the 3 on the play we set up as we closed to within 3 with 11 seconds to go. UCLA scored on a quick jumper and we threw up a last second 3 from behind the half court line that went in. But we still lost 73-71. A good effort by us but not quite good enough. Losing our last two conference games was tough but both were against very talented teams and we were in both up to the final buzzer. PF/SF Kenton Dunn scored 22, grabbed 8 boards, and blocked 3 shots. PF Charles Maors scored 12 and SG Steve Jackson hit for 11 points. UCLA’s SG Kyle Taylor poured in 30 points and had 8 rebounds and 4 blocks while PG Darelle Denson scored 24. While we it was disappointing to lose another close game, we were buoyed when we checked the other Pac-12 scores: #23 Stanford-79, Arizona-64 Washington State-85, #19 California-73 Utah-74, Oregon State-55 Oregon-61, USC-58 Arizona State-83, Washington-63 So with Arizona and California also losing, we remained in a 3-way tie with those two teams for 2nd place. The tie-breakers favor us so we’ll be the #2 seed in the conference tournament.
  15. Trouble in Paradise: The NCAA announced penalties for the following teams due to findings that they’ve offered bribes to recruits: Baylor—1 year post-season ban and no scholarship offers for 2 years. Texas—1 year post-season ban and no scholarship offers for 2 years. Savannah State—2 year post-season ban and no scholarship offers for 3 years. Kent State—2 year post-season ban and no scholarship offers for 3 years. In addition, investigations have been initiated against the following teams: Jacksonville Cornell
  16. The guy is actually playing pretty well. 3 games in, 1 G, 1 A, even rating, 5 shots, 2 hits, 75 performance. I'm going to give him 2-3 more games. He scored a nice goal today to put the Stealheads up 3-1. Unfortunately, I also started my 19 year old, 79 overall goalie and ended up losing 4-3.
  17. Small update for those interested: Simulation engine is almost done with a few exceptions. (Note: It was already pretty close but needed a few tweaks.) 1. I still need to implement strategies, currently the game chooses based on down and distance as well as field position. 2. I need to implement saving results and stats to the database. Once I complete those (this is a slow process for me as previously mentioned due to time constraints) I might be ready for an alpha version for consumers to try it out. Much of the game is not completed but if results can be generated and saved at least I'll be ready to let people do testing.
  18. Does any one play FM20 or any of the other earlier games online? I'm wondering how is is before I try it myself. Playing against the computer is a lot of fun, wondering if the online game is as good.
  19. I just got the full version of FM2020 and so far it's great!
  20. Paul T

    Advanced stats help

    I don't have a strong opinion on it, but here's why I wouldn't necessarily agree with this. 1) High Corsi doesn't necessarily mean that team is dominating games. It could be as simple as, the team goes down early and plays Offensive when trailing. This could lead to more shot attempts, but not necessarily quality chances. Or the team could play Defensive and just not allow many shots, but not get many quality scoring chances. Either way, in this specific case, the Red Dragons are facing relegation so the high Corsi isn't helping. 2) The game has an element of randomness to it, much like the sport itself. That's a good thing. Sometimes certain outcomes just don't make sense, other than the element of randomness. Overall, the game is directionally accurate and the "better" teams tend to place higher in the standings/have better stats. 3) If we had the tools to determine exactly why stuff like this happened, then every manager would use the same tactics, build the same roster, play the same focus. That would get pretty boring. I like the fact that every manager is given a clean slate and able to customize their team to their liking without there being a "right" or "wrong" way to do it. 4) Personally, I think statistical outliers add fun to the game. It's fun when an inferior team is high in the standings - or a completely stacked team isn't as good as everyone thought. Although I would admit that this isn't necessarily fair... but sometimes sports aren't fair (or life for that matter). 5) If you take a close look at this specific team, they have a very unique set up. An Offensive Defenseman playing 1st line wing. A Two Way D playing 4th line wing. That would definitely screw with the simulation. But I think we all agree the game needs more micromanagement, so I see that as a good thing. Figure out unique ways to set your lineup. If you compare their defense to mine, they are actually better. Red Dragons - 90 89 88 88 88 85 (528) Stealheads - 92 88 88 87 86 81 (522)
  21. New Jersey Generals (4-7) 3 17 3 0 -- 23 Michigan Panthers (5-6) 3 0 14 11 -- 28 First Quarter New Jersey - Vanderjagt 27 FG, 5:56 Michigan - Lindell 31 FG, 8:40 Second Quarter New Jersey - Rhodes 23 pass from Pennington (Vanderjagt kick), 3:26 New Jersey - Zereoue 12 run (Vanderjagt kick), 12:03 New Jersey - Vanderjagt 32 FG, 15:00 Third Quarter Michigan - Alexander 1 run (Lindell kick), 4:21 Michigan - Smith 7 pass from Brooks (Lindell kick), 9:41 New Jersey - Vanderjagt 35 FG, 13:31 Fourth Quarter Michigan - Lindell 32 FG, 2:41 Michigan - Bryson 80 pass from Brooks (Alexander pass from Brooks), 13:10 New Jersey was leading this game 23-20 with 2:10 in the 4th quarter, when Michigan backup HB Shawn Bryson catches a screen pass from QB Aaron Brooks. With excellent downfield blocking and great speed, Bryson is able to take the pass 80 yards for the game winning TD. Michigan QB Aaron Brooks was outstanding during the game and his receiving corps were excellent as well. MICHIGAN PANTHERS Passing Cmp Att Yds %% TD INT QB1 Aaron Brooks 20 31 360 64.5 2 0 Rushing Att Yds Avg TD Fmb HB1 Shaun Alexander 13 33 2.5 1 0 HB3 Kevan Barlow 2 -3 -1.5 0 0 QB1 Aaron Brooks 4 -5 -1.3 0 0 Receiving Rec Yds Avg TD Fmb Trgt HB2 Shawn Bryson 5 103 20.6 1 0 5 WR2 Dane Looker 5 94 18.8 0 0 8 WR3 Larry Foster 3 51 17.0 0 0 3 TE1 Jim Kleinsasser 2 48 24.0 0 0 2 HB1 Shaun Alexander 2 35 17.5 0 0 2 WR1 Dante Hall 1 21 21.0 0 0 6 WR4 Steve Smith 2 8 4.0 1 0 4 Defense Tck Sck Int Fmb TD Knk Saf CB1 David Macklin 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 S1 Will Allen 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 LB2 Sam Cowart 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 CB4 Jimmy Williams 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 CB3 Renaldo Hill 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 CB2 Kenoy Kennedy 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 LB1 Joey Porter 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 LB3 Greg Favors 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 DE2 Jason Peter 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 S4 Marlon McCree 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 DE1 Andre Wadsworth 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 S2 Matt Bowen 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 S3 David Gibson 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 LB4 Warrick Holdman 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 DT1 Anthony McFarland 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 DT2 Roderick Coleman 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 NEW JERSEY GENERALS Passing Cmp Att Yds %% TD INT QB1 Chad Pennington 25 40 264 62.5 1 0 Rushing Att Yds Avg TD Fmb HB1 Amos Zereoue 19 111 5.8 1 0 QB1 Chad Pennington 3 44 14.7 0 0 HB2 Travis Henry 2 16 8.0 0 0 HB3 Dominic Rhodes 1 0 0.0 0 0 FB1 Nick Goings 2 0 0.0 0 0 Receiving Rec Yds Avg TD Fmb Trgt WR1 Az-Zahir Hakim 5 79 15.8 0 0 10 WR3 Quincy Morgan 6 73 12.2 0 0 7 WR2 Troy Edwards 5 44 8.8 0 0 8 HB3 Dominic Rhodes 2 27 13.5 1 0 2 HB2 Travis Henry 2 15 7.5 0 0 2 TE2 Todd Yoder 2 11 5.5 0 0 2 HB1 Amos Zereoue 2 10 5.0 0 0 2 FB1 Nick Goings 1 5 5.0 0 0 1 Defense Tck Sck Int Fmb TD Knk Saf S1 Dexter Jackson 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 CB3 Fred Smoot 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 CB1 Champ Bailey 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 CB2 Mike McKenzie 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 CB4 William Bartee 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 LB1 Antonio Pierce 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 LB5 Barry Gardner 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 S3 Chris Akins 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 DT1 Jamal Williams 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 DT2 Kendrick Clancy 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 S2 Kevin Kaesviharn 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 DE3 Byron Frisch 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 LB2 Jeff Posey 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 LB3 Darren Hambrick 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 PLAYS OF THE GAME Michigan HB Shawn Bryson 80yd TD Catch New Jersey WR Az-Zahir Hakim 38yd Catch
  22. Peekaboo

    Advanced stats help

    Yeah, but to have shots you have to have puck possesion. So basically, Corsi would determine how well you play up until puck goes in the goal. Its still something off here, looking at roster. Or very big statistical error, or there is much more in the variables then just ratings (traits?), maybe too much. We still need tools to better understand when something like this happens.
  23. If it is an issue updating .net framework then you should be able to download it here: https://dotnet.microsoft.com/download/dotnet-framework
  24. rainsilent

    Advanced stats help

    Not necessarily true. Remember that corsi is strictly counting shots for and shots against. It actually has nothing to do with puck control directly. It is a statistical assumption that the team taking more shots has the puck more. As for how this applies here? The same as it applies to my team. My team isn't near as talented as yours or the many others that sit at the top of the standings. Yet I have good corsi numbers too. That team is another example, just like mine is, of getting the right players that they need for their system but with two flaws sinking that team. Lack of goaltending and lack of scoring. They have a talented enough team to fight for a playoff spot if they had a good goalie. I have yet to look at the games that team has played so I can't say if they are true puck possession monsters but they have a good enough group talent wise that they can be a solid puck possession team.
  25. 3W - 6L in shootouts this season. 1 goal on my last 10 attempts. Awful.
  1. Load more activity